---
title: "LXD: Containers for Human Beings"
subtitle: "Docker's great and all, but I prefer the workflow of interacting with VMs"
date: 2023-08-11T16:30:00-04:00
categories:
- Technology
tags:
- Sysadmin
- Containers
- VMs
- Docker
- LXD
draft: true
rss_only: false
cover: ./cover.png
---
This is a blog post version of a talk I presented at both Ubuntu Summit 2022 and
SouthEast LinuxFest 2023. The first was not recorded, but the second was and is
on [SELF's PeerTube instance.][selfpeertube] I apologise for the terrible audio,
but there's unfortunately nothing I can do about that. If you're already
intimately familiar with the core concepts of VMs or containers, I would suggest
skipping those respective sections. If you're vaguely familiar with either, I
would recommend reading them because I do go a little bit in-depth.
[selfpeertube]: https://peertube.linuxrocks.online/w/hjiTPHVwGz4hy9n3cUL1mq?start=1m
{{< adm type="warn" >}}
**Note:** Canonical has decided to [pull LXD out][lxd] from under the Linux
Containers entity and instead continue development under the Canonical brand.
The majority of the LXD creators and developers have congregated around a fork
called [Incus.][inc] I'll be keeping a close eye on the project and intend to
migrate as soon as there's an installable release.
[lxd]: https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/
[inc]: https://linuxcontainers.org/incus/
{{< /adm >}}
## The benefits of VMs and containers
- **Isolation:** you don't want to allow an attacker to infiltrate your email
server through your web application; the two should be completely separate
from each other and VMs/containers provide strong isolation guarantees.
- **Flexibility:** VMs and containers only
use the resources they've been given. If you tell the VM it has 200 MBs of
RAM, it's going to make do with 200 MBs of RAM and the kernel's OOM killer is going to have a fun time 🤠
- **Portability:** once set up and configured, VMs and containers can mostly be
treated as black boxes; as long as the surrounding environment of the new host
is similar to the previous in terms of communication (proxies, web servers,
etc.), they can just be picked up and dropped between various hosts as
necessary.
- **Density:** applications are usually much lighter than the systems they're
running on, so it makes sense to run many applications on one system. VMs and
containers facilitate that without sacrificing security.
- **Cleanliness:** VMs and containers are applications in black boxes. When
you're done with the box, you can just throw it away and most everything
related to the application is gone.
## Virtual machines
As the name suggests, Virtual Machines are all virtual; a hypervisor creates
virtual disks for storage, virtual CPUs, virtual NICs,
virtual RAM, etc. On top of the
virtualised hardware, you have your kernel. This is what facilitates
communication between the operating system and the (virtual) hardware. Above
that is the operating system and all your applications.
At this point, the stack is quite large; VMs aren't exactly lightweight, and
this impacts how densely you can pack the host.
I mentioned a "hypervisor" a minute ago. I've explained what hypervisors in
general do, but there are actually two different kinds of hypervisor. They're
creatively named **Type 1** and **Type 2**.
### Type 1 hypervisors
These run directly in the host kernel without an intermediary OS. A good example
would be [KVM,][kvm] a **VM** hypervisor than runs in the **K**ernel. Type 1
hypervisors can communicate directly with the host's hardware to allocate RAM,
issue instructions to the CPU, etc.
[debian]: https://debian.org
[kvm]: https://www.linux-kvm.org
[vb]: https://www.virtualbox.org/
```kroki {type=d2,d2theme=flagship-terrastruct,d2sketch=true}
direction: up
hk: Host kernel
hk.1h: Type 1 hypervisor
k1: Guest kernel
k2: Guest kernel
k3: Guest kernel
os1: Guest OS
os2: Guest OS
os3: Guest OS
app1: Many apps
app2: Many apps
app3: Many apps
app1 <- os1 <- k1 <- hk
app2 <- os2 <- k2 <- hk
app3 <- os3 <- k3 <- hk
```
### Type 2 hypervisors
These run in userspace as an application, like [VirtualBox.][vb] Type 2
hypervisors have to first go through the operating system, adding an additional
layer to the stack.
```kroki {type=d2,d2theme=flagship-terrastruct,d2sketch=true}
direction: up
hk: Host kernel
os: Operating system
os.2h: Type 2 hypervisor
k1: Guest kernel
k2: Guest kernel
k3: Guest kernel
os1: Guest OS
os2: Guest OS
os3: Guest OS
app1: Many apps
app2: Many apps
app3: Many apps
os <- hk
app1 <- os1 <- k1 <- os
app2 <- os2 <- k2 <- os
app3 <- os3 <- k3 <- os
```
## Containers
```kroki {type=d2,d2theme=flagship-terrastruct,d2sketch=true}
title: |md
# Application containers
| { near: top-center }
direction: up
Host kernel -> Hypervisor
Hypervisor -> One app
Hypervisor -> Few apps
Hypervisor -> Full OS -> Many apps
```
```kroki {type=d2,d2theme=flagship-terrastruct,d2sketch=true}
title: |md
# System containers
| { near: top-center }
direction: up
os1: Full OS
os2: Full OS
os3: Full OS
app1: Many apps
app2: Many apps
app3: Many apps
Host kernel -> os1 -> app1
Host kernel -> os2 -> app2
Host kernel -> os3 -> app3
```
## When to use VMs
- Virtualising esoteric hardware
- Virtualising non-Linux operating systems (Windows, macOS)
- Completely isolating processes from one another with a decades-old, battle-tested technique
{{< adm type="note" >}}
See Drew DeVault's blog post [_In praise of qemu_](https://earl.run/rmBs) for a great use of VMs
{{< /adm >}}
### When you use application containers
- Microservices
- Extremely reproducible builds
- (NixOS.org would likely be a better fit though)
- Dead-set on using cloud platforms with extreme scaling capabilities (AWS, GCP, etc.)
- When the app you want to run is _only_ distributed as a Docker container and
the maintainers adamantly refuse to support any other deployment method
- (Docker does run in LXD 😉)
### System containers
- Anything not listed above 👍
## Crash course to LXD
### Installation
{{< adm type="note" >}}
**Note:** the instructions below say to install LXD using [Snap.][snap] I
personally dislike Snap, but LXD is a Canonical product and Canonical is doing
their best to push Snap down everyone's throats ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯ One of the first
things the Incus project did was [rip out Snap support,][rsnap] and I can't wait
until they have proper `.deb`s 😁
[snap]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snap_(software)
[rsnap]: https://github.com/lxc/incus/compare/9579f65cd0f215ecd847e8c1cea2ebe96c56be4a...3f64077a80e028bb92b491d42037124e9734d4c7
{{< /adm >}}
1. Install snap following [Canonical's tutorial](https://earl.run/ZvUK)
- LXD is natively packaged for Arch and Alpine, but configuration can be a
massive headache.
2. `sudo snap install lxd`
3. `lxd init`
4. `lxc image copy images:debian/11 local: --alias deb-11`
5. `lxc launch deb-11 container-name`
6. `lxc shell container-name`
### Usage
{install my URL shortener}