|
|
|
|
@ -4,14 +4,14 @@
|
|
|
|
|
decentralised, and somewhat stripped-down alternative to [Ultimate |
|
|
|
|
Guitar](https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## But … why? |
|
|
|
|
# But … why? |
|
|
|
|
While the core functionality of UG is fantastic, I believe many of the |
|
|
|
|
features are completely unnecessary and only serve to clutter the UI. I |
|
|
|
|
also dislike the inundation of ads, paywalling of important features |
|
|
|
|
such as PDF export, and the implication that every single piece has a |
|
|
|
|
video tutorial you *could* access … if only you were a Pro user. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Ok, what features will it have? |
|
|
|
|
# Ok, what features will it have? |
|
|
|
|
I think the most basic features necessary for use are… |
|
|
|
|
- Basic tab formatting with |
|
|
|
|
[ChordPro](https://www.chordpro.org/chordpro/index.html) syntax |
|
|
|
|
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Nice-to-have features would include
|
|
|
|
|
- Comments |
|
|
|
|
- Would require addition to moderation system |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## You mentioned "decentralisation". Whot? |
|
|
|
|
# You mentioned "decentralisation". Whot? |
|
|
|
|
My plan is to implement some sort of |
|
|
|
|
[ActivityPub](https://activitypub.rocks/) support, allowing users on one |
|
|
|
|
instance to discover tabs created by users on another instance and |
|
|
|
|
@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ grow and become a more viable alternative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's the idea anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Do you have a timeline? |
|
|
|
|
# Do you have a timeline? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nope! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
