remove repetitive words
Signed-off-by: teslaedison <qingchengqiushuang@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a665d3245a
commit
0f3a21d965
|
@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ func isFileThere(candidate string) bool {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// verifyTokenAtEdge checks for a token on disk, or generates a new one.
|
// verifyTokenAtEdge checks for a token on disk, or generates a new one.
|
||||||
// Then makes a request to to the origin with the token to ensure it is valid.
|
// Then makes a request to the origin with the token to ensure it is valid.
|
||||||
// Returns nil if token is valid.
|
// Returns nil if token is valid.
|
||||||
func verifyTokenAtEdge(appUrl *url.URL, appInfo *token.AppInfo, c *cli.Context, log *zerolog.Logger) error {
|
func verifyTokenAtEdge(appUrl *url.URL, appInfo *token.AppInfo, c *cli.Context, log *zerolog.Logger) error {
|
||||||
headers := parseRequestHeaders(c.StringSlice(sshHeaderFlag))
|
headers := parseRequestHeaders(c.StringSlice(sshHeaderFlag))
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ HTMLAttrToAdd.setAttribute("lang", "en");
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<h4 id="secondflawthejudicialrolewaslimited">Second Flaw: The Judicial Role was Limited</h4>
|
<h4 id="secondflawthejudicialrolewaslimited">Second Flaw: The Judicial Role was Limited</h4>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<p>Not only did British courts share the power to address patent rights historically, the part shared by the the courts was significantly limited. Historically, the common-law and chancery courts only received a partial delegation of the Privy Council’s authority to invalidate patents. Courts only had the authority to invalidate patents for issues related to things like inequitable conduct (e.g., making false statements in the original patent application). The limited authority delegated to the England Courts did not include the authority to seek claim <em>cancellation</em> based on elements intrinsic to the patent or patent application, like lack of novelty or obviousness as done under an IPR proceeding. Rather, such authority remained with the Privy Council, a non-court authority, which decided questions like whether the invention was really new. Thus, like the PTAB, the Privy Council was a non-judicial body charged with responsibility to assess patent validity based on criteria that included the novelty of the invention.</p>
|
<p>Not only did British courts share the power to address patent rights historically, the part shared by the courts was significantly limited. Historically, the common-law and chancery courts only received a partial delegation of the Privy Council’s authority to invalidate patents. Courts only had the authority to invalidate patents for issues related to things like inequitable conduct (e.g., making false statements in the original patent application). The limited authority delegated to the England Courts did not include the authority to seek claim <em>cancellation</em> based on elements intrinsic to the patent or patent application, like lack of novelty or obviousness as done under an IPR proceeding. Rather, such authority remained with the Privy Council, a non-court authority, which decided questions like whether the invention was really new. Thus, like the PTAB, the Privy Council was a non-judicial body charged with responsibility to assess patent validity based on criteria that included the novelty of the invention.</p>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<p>We think these arguments are compelling and provide very strong reasons why the Supreme Court should resist the request that such matters be resolved exclusively in federal courts. We hope that’s the position they do take because the real world implications are significant. </p>
|
<p>We think these arguments are compelling and provide very strong reasons why the Supreme Court should resist the request that such matters be resolved exclusively in federal courts. We hope that’s the position they do take because the real world implications are significant. </p>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ func (e *LogEventType) UnmarshalJSON(data []byte) error {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// LogLevel corresponds to the zerolog logging levels
|
// LogLevel corresponds to the zerolog logging levels
|
||||||
// "panic", "fatal", and "trace" are exempt from this list as they are rarely used and, at least
|
// "panic", "fatal", and "trace" are exempt from this list as they are rarely used and, at least
|
||||||
// the the first two are limited to failure conditions that lead to cloudflared shutting down.
|
// the first two are limited to failure conditions that lead to cloudflared shutting down.
|
||||||
type LogLevel int8
|
type LogLevel int8
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
const (
|
const (
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ func (b *BackoffHandler) Backoff(ctx context.Context) bool {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Sets a grace period within which the the backoff timer is maintained. After the grace
|
// Sets a grace period within which the backoff timer is maintained. After the grace
|
||||||
// period expires, the number of retries & backoff duration is reset.
|
// period expires, the number of retries & backoff duration is reset.
|
||||||
func (b *BackoffHandler) SetGracePeriod() time.Duration {
|
func (b *BackoffHandler) SetGracePeriod() time.Duration {
|
||||||
maxTimeToWait := b.GetBaseTime() * 2 << (b.retries + 1)
|
maxTimeToWait := b.GetBaseTime() * 2 << (b.retries + 1)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue