remove repetitive words

Signed-off-by: teslaedison <qingchengqiushuang@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
teslaedison 2024-04-03 00:48:50 +08:00
parent a665d3245a
commit 0f3a21d965
4 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ func isFileThere(candidate string) bool {
}
// verifyTokenAtEdge checks for a token on disk, or generates a new one.
// Then makes a request to to the origin with the token to ensure it is valid.
// Then makes a request to the origin with the token to ensure it is valid.
// Returns nil if token is valid.
func verifyTokenAtEdge(appUrl *url.URL, appInfo *token.AppInfo, c *cli.Context, log *zerolog.Logger) error {
headers := parseRequestHeaders(c.StringSlice(sshHeaderFlag))

View File

@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ HTMLAttrToAdd.setAttribute("lang", "en");
<h4 id="secondflawthejudicialrolewaslimited">Second Flaw: The Judicial Role was Limited</h4>
<p>Not only did British courts share the power to address patent rights historically, the part shared by the the courts was significantly limited. Historically, the common-law and chancery courts only received a partial delegation of the Privy Councils authority to invalidate patents. Courts only had the authority to invalidate patents for issues related to things like inequitable conduct (e.g., making false statements in the original patent application). The limited authority delegated to the England Courts did not include the authority to seek claim <em>cancellation</em> based on elements intrinsic to the patent or patent application, like lack of novelty or obviousness as done under an IPR proceeding. Rather, such authority remained with the Privy Council, a non-court authority, which decided questions like whether the invention was really new. Thus, like the PTAB, the Privy Council was a non-judicial body charged with responsibility to assess patent validity based on criteria that included the novelty of the invention.</p>
<p>Not only did British courts share the power to address patent rights historically, the part shared by the courts was significantly limited. Historically, the common-law and chancery courts only received a partial delegation of the Privy Councils authority to invalidate patents. Courts only had the authority to invalidate patents for issues related to things like inequitable conduct (e.g., making false statements in the original patent application). The limited authority delegated to the England Courts did not include the authority to seek claim <em>cancellation</em> based on elements intrinsic to the patent or patent application, like lack of novelty or obviousness as done under an IPR proceeding. Rather, such authority remained with the Privy Council, a non-court authority, which decided questions like whether the invention was really new. Thus, like the PTAB, the Privy Council was a non-judicial body charged with responsibility to assess patent validity based on criteria that included the novelty of the invention.</p>
<p>We think these arguments are compelling and provide very strong reasons why the Supreme Court should resist the request that such matters be resolved exclusively in federal courts. We hope thats the position they do take because the real world implications are significant. </p>

View File

@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ func (e *LogEventType) UnmarshalJSON(data []byte) error {
// LogLevel corresponds to the zerolog logging levels
// "panic", "fatal", and "trace" are exempt from this list as they are rarely used and, at least
// the the first two are limited to failure conditions that lead to cloudflared shutting down.
// the first two are limited to failure conditions that lead to cloudflared shutting down.
type LogLevel int8
const (

View File

@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ func (b *BackoffHandler) Backoff(ctx context.Context) bool {
}
}
// Sets a grace period within which the the backoff timer is maintained. After the grace
// Sets a grace period within which the backoff timer is maintained. After the grace
// period expires, the number of retries & backoff duration is reset.
func (b *BackoffHandler) SetGracePeriod() time.Duration {
maxTimeToWait := b.GetBaseTime() * 2 << (b.retries + 1)