diff --git a/.domains b/.domains
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index 5d61550..831d286 100755
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
Announcement Box
- - 2025-10-01: VALERIE Issue 5 and Total Woman Victory Issue 4 are out now! VALERIE covers struggles between mothers and daughters, and Total Woman Victory honors our feminist foremothers, with a special focus on submissions by women in the Global South. Both, of course, are free to download and read.
+ - 2025-10-01: VALERIE Issue 5 and Total Woman Victory Volume 1 Issue 4 are out now! VALERIE covers struggles between mothers and daughters, and Total Woman Victory honors our feminist foremothers, with a special focus on submissions by women in the Global South. Both, of course, are free to download and read.
- 2025-08-13: Friendly reminder that I have never paywalled ANY of my books and NEVER WILL. Anyone trying to sell you a copy of a book I have written is trying to scam you.
diff --git a/recs/anti_ai.html b/recs/anti_ai.html
index e03b111..95fb4de 100755
--- a/recs/anti_ai.html
+++ b/recs/anti_ai.html
@@ -286,6 +286,28 @@
We can summarize these positions about AI and people as follows. Kurzweilians (mythologists about AI, full-stop) wax mystical about machines after the Singularity having consciousness, emotions, motives, and vast intelligence... Russellians want to keep Ex Machina in movies, downsizing talk about superintelligence to more mathematically respectable ideas about general computation achieving "objectives." Unfortunately, Russellians tend to lump human beings into restricted definitions of intelligence, too. This reduces the perceived gap between human and machine, but only by reducing human possibility along with it. |
+
+
+
+ | The Singularity Is Nearer |
+ Ray Kurzweil |
+ Casual |
+
+
+ | This still assumes that every neuron is necessary for working human cognition, which we know isn't true. There is a large (but still poorly understood) degree of parallelism in the brain, with individual neurons or cortical modules doing redundant work (or work that at least could be duplicated elsewhere). This is evidenced by people's ability to make a full functional recovery after a stroke or brain injury destroys part of their brain. Thus, the computational demands of simulating the cognitively relevant neural structures in our brains are probably even lower than the preceding estimates. And so 1014 looks conservative as a most likely range. If brain simulation requires computational power in that range, as of 2023, about $1,000 worth of hardware can already achieve this. |
+
+
+
+
+
+ | Deep Medicine |
+ Eric Topol |
+ Casual |
+
+
+ | All that data has to be constantly assembled and analyzed, seamlessly, without being obtrusive to the individual. That means there should not be any manual logging on and off or active effort required. That's not so easy: for example, as I experienced firsthand, there's no method for capturing what food we ingest without manual entry via an app or website. When I did that for two weeks along with exercise and sleep (detailed in Chapter 11), my only solace was that it would only last for two weeks. Any AI coach that would be learning over a period much longer than days could not be predicated on users having to work to input their data. |
+
+